IN COALITION POLITICS A JUNIOR PARTNER SOMETIMES CAN BE A COMPULSION TO TAKE WHAT IT WANTS AND SOMETIMES NOT TO BE OBLIGED: DEPENDS ON SITUATION AND STRATEGY BOTH-AS GIVE AND TAKE

IN COALITION POLITICS A JUNIOR PARTNER SOMETIMES CAN BE A COMPULSION TO TAKE WHAT IT WANTS AND SOMETIMES NOT TO BE OBLIGED : DEPENDS ON SITUATION AND STRATEGY BOTH-AS GIVE AND TAKE


Dear Readers, 

In coalition politics sometimes a Junior Partner can become an "Inevitable Compulsion" to take what it wants and Sometimes can be "Phased Out" also and not to be obliged, depending on the "Situation and Strategy". 

Coalition Politics is always dependent on "Situation and Strategy" that can suit to the Major Partner or the Junior Partners. 

If the situation is such that a Major Partner in Coalition Politics can not achieve the objective it wants to achieve and, the dependence on a Junior Partner is an Inevitable Compulsion in such situation, then the Major Partner will be willing to give and succumb to what the junior partner would demand in order for the Major Partner  to achieve its objective or their common objective. 

However, there could be a situation also, where the strategy can be changed and a Junior Partner can be phased out and not to be obliged, still the Major Parter can achieve its Objective or the common objective. To have a situation like this, the Major Parter should create and take along multiple Junior Partners to keep them in competing situation, so that one of them does not become the inevitable compulsion and feels to be indispensable. In this case, the Major Partner can have the leverage and lever at hand to phase out a Junior Partner tending to be inevitable compulsion and not obliging it, and the Major Partner can still achieve the Objectives with Other Junior Partners. 

This is a very interesting approach and strategy to have multiple junior partners in Coalition Politics. so that the Major Partner can avoid inevitable compulsion of a junior partner and total dependence on it and a junior partner does not become indispensable to snatch what it wants even at the cost of the major partner.  

However, in Coalition Politics, retaining the Pre-Poll Alliances intact and managing it under trust, as I said, not making a junior partner indispensable and inevitable compulsion and harbouring multiple junior partners strategically keeping them in competition, while still the Major Partner achieving its objective or achieving the common objective, can work well and well sustaining in longer term interest, that can give leave way for the Major Partner to consolidate for the long term. 

If you look around and apply your mind, you will find situations that could be very interesting in this line. Apply your mind and understand as you get to understand..... in all fairness, I can't progress to explain you more and further on this. 

Coalition Politics is ultimately the system of "Give and Take"; when it is an inevitable compulsion, it is wise to "Give" and when it is a situation conducive to phase out a compulsion of a junior partner who can not be obliged at the cost of the major partner, do not hesitate to "Take".

What I am writing may sound like a lot of theory and mundane, however, it is the reality and pragmatically used in practical situations ... though can not be empirically displayed and demonstrated due to also inevitable compulsion in relevant situations, it is a limitation of the subject matter to deal with, let me admit.

Best regards,

Dr. Nimain Charan Biswal,
Mumbai, India 


About the Author: Dr. Nimain Charan Biswal is a B.Sc.(Agri. Science and Technology), M.B.A. and Ph.D.(Management Area ) by qualifications; and he has 38+ years of work experience in both industrial and development sectors in diversified fields of social importance. He has been educated at Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT)-Bhubaneswar, Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA) and Gujarat University (with Resource Support of IIM-Ahmedabad). He is further educated at IIM-Calcutta, XLRI-Jamshedpur, Apple Computer Industries and Spar Inc., USA. He has worked for reputed National and International Organizations in Senior/Top Management Capacities at Board level as well as Managing Director and CEO. He is a management expert covering extensive areas from management in industrial sectors, management in agriculture and dairy, development management to management of public systems. He is a prominent professional of India and known Internationally as well. He is also a Political Strategist. He lives at Mumbai in India.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DR. V. KURIEN HAD SOME QUALITIES LESS PUBLISHED (TRIBUTE ON HIS DEATH ANNIVERSARY ON 09 SEPTEMBER)

THE MENACE OF BLOCKING AND MUTING IN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS

WHEN PROTEGES DEFY AND CROSS THE PATH OF THEIR MENTORS, BOUND TO REMAIN IN SOME POOR LIGHT IN THE TIME LINE OF HISTORY

TRIBUTE TO DR. V. KURIEN ON HIS 101st BIRTHDAY : 26 November

WHAT I FELT WHEN IN THE WHOLE OF MEDIA A BUNCH OF TYCOONS, HONCHOS AND BIASED-ECONOMISTS OF INDIA WERE REJOICING FOR SALE OF "AIR INDIA" TO TATA : ITS LIKE SELLING THE UTENSILS OF OUR INDIAN NATIONAL KITCHEN .....SAD....VERY SAD…

INDIA TOPPING THE WORLD BY DOUBLING ITS GDP IN LAST 10YEARS: WE CAN'T BE MISER TO APPRECIATE THE NATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND OUR ACHIEVEMENT AS A NATION

DO YOU THROW EMPTY POUCHES OF MILK WASHED OR UNWASHED? THROW IT WASHED AND BE CONSIDERATE FOR THE HUMAN SOCIETY AND THE ENVIRONMENT

THE THEORY OF DIRTY LINEN : INSTITUTIONAL DIRTY LINEN HAVE TO BE CLEANED: NO EXCUSE IN ANY CASE

A TEACHER PAR EXCELLENCE, A HUMAN PAR EXCELLENCE, YOU ARE IMMORTAL BY YOUR SPECIAL PLACE

THE FARMERS OF CO-OPERATIVE DAIRIES OR DAIRY FARMERS WOULD NEVER DITCH AGRICULTURE FARMERS’ INTEREST